Though I have no decent upload for you yet, I’d like to refer you to my site:
Joost de Nooy’s Portfolio
where you can find the final movie in the menu with the title: “Programmed to Receive”

enjoy!

..oh well, just have a look for yourselves:

You know what they say about first impressions…
Title sequences can be engaging or wildly entertaining, funny, exhilarating, or simply drop dead beautiful. They can be oozing with visual poetry and sophisticated imagery while others hit you hard with their bold and audacious stylistic gestures. And let’s face it, everybody loves a good title sequence.

The very best title sequences not only succeed in putting the audience in the right mood for the movie, they transcend their proper function and venture off into the realm of something far deeper and far greater. They are the signifiers of contemporary pop culture and an art form in their own right. Just look at the impact of, for example, Kyle Cooper’s title sequence for Se7en that has left an indelible mark, not just on film and motion design, but on contemporary visual culture as a whole.

Trying to turn this into a more audio/visual product, lead me to the idea of making a title sequence,
featuring, of course, Mr. George Clooney. Thus began the hunt for title sequences.

So, I’d like to share with you the following site:
The Art of the Title Sequence
and some (in my opinion) beautiful examples from the movie “Up in the Air”
(though I like the stills better than the title sequence)

Well, here’s one of the most common examples. Backmasking.

Backmasking (also known as backward masking) is a recording technique in which a sound or message is recorded backward onto a track that is meant to be played forward. Backmasking is a deliberate process, whereas a message found through phonetic reversal may be unintentional.

The question for most songs we find this in though, still remains, is this actual backmasking or just coincidence?
I’ll give you a little example:

if you listen to the following soundbite, most people will hear text, but can’t really recognize anything.
Backmask of Stairway to Heaven

now, this is what some people believe as the backmasking track is in this song:

Oh, here’s to my sweet Satan. The one whose little path would make me sad, whose power is satan.
He’ll give those with him 666. There was a little toolshed where he made us suffer, sad satan.

With that text in your head, listen to the audio sample again, see if you can make out the words.
Does that prove a theory? Are we busy sampling and using that to understand the rest of our world?

Here are some more examples of backmasking in songs:
Backmasking

It does show us that recognition is one of the major aspects that is involved here, and something
that has a major impact on all of us. No matter if it is used in sound, commercials, business, logo’s or language.
Recognition and identification is part of our daily lives.

the full publication can be found here:
American Naturalist (May 2006) The Structures of Letters and Symbols

and a small excerpt to give you an idea as to what it is about:

Are there empirical regularities in the shapes of letters and other human visual signs, and if so, what are the selection pressures underlying these regularities? To examine this, we determined a wide variety of topologically distinct contour configurations and examined the relative frequency of these configuration types across writing systems, Chinese writing, and nonlinguistic symbols. Our first result is that these three classes of human visual sign possess a similar signature in their configuration distribution, suggesting that there are underlying principles governing the shapes of human visual signs

So are we programmed to recognize? and do we use this, once we have an example. Is that why we all see people with perfectly symmetric faces as beautiful?
The publication talks about recognition and reproduction, so in moving image and sound, does this transfer to recognition and relating to the subject?

While reading a book on hawaiian mythology (Hawaiian Mythology – Martha Beckwith) I came across an explanation maybe one of the most logical examples of interpretation and misinterpretation available right there and then.

The story goes that a child is killed because he broke a kapu (taboo) law. The body is found due to a god entering a blowfly’s body and leading the parent to the burial place of the child. The killer is killed, but to escape from vengeance from his family,the parent flees with a canoe. The killer’s family casts a bad weather curse, but the fleeing person is saved by his gods who drive away the storm while in the form of a school of fish.

Though this is an interesting mythological tale, all the symbols can be retraced to natural occurrences.
If we rationalize all the symbols, the tale becomes a lot less exciting.
- Blowflies are attracted to putrefying flesh
- Bad weather is caused by meteorological disturbances
- Schools of fish come with clearing water
It shows that all these signs aren’t the cause of the occurrences but merely accompany them or even more so, follow them.

Seeing as this is just a story, what can it tell us about our real-life interpretation. Do we interpret real life situations differently then we do things we see on our television screens?
Are the people we see in the movies still people, personifications, or more gods, that we only look up to and hope to be related to – if only a little?

Stereotypes act like codes that give audiences a quick, common understanding of a person or group of people—usually relating to their class, ethnicity or race, gender, sexual orientation, social role or occupation.

But stereotypes can be problematic. They can:
- reduce a wide range of differences in people to simplistic categorizations
- transform assumptions about particular groups of people into “realities”
- be used to justify the position of those in power
- perpetuate social prejudice and inequality
More often than not, the groups being stereotyped have little to say about how they are represented.

Interesting enough it turns out we are listening and viewing someone’s idea of what these groups are, if we focus on the last line. Groups that are displayed do not have actual influence on how they are shown, but are actually someone’s idea of how they are supposed to be. It seems that TV and marketing have found something in common that will be a big advantage: profiling. Stereotyping is merely their way of making us shop for the products they want I guess.

TIME Magazine has an interesting article on Breaking the American Stereotypes starting of with just a small example of how much stereotyping is already part of our daily lives:

The other day a white fellow, he said how wonderful my home is, and how good we get along together, and how impressed he was by it all. I wanted to say, ‘Don’t be giving us that kind of compliment, because it shows on you what you don’t know about us.’
—Mississippi black man

The article gives us some interesting examples of the many (for they are many) stereotypes that are actually out there. One option the article gives us for all this stereotyping that really stands out in my opinion is the following:

As one activist in Mississippi told Coles, people “don’t want to be troubled by finding anything ‘good’ in the people they come to save from everything ‘bad.’ “